G.W. Bush was recently in Israel speaking at the 60th birthday of the nation. He spoke about many things but, one thing he mentioned, in particular has made headlines across the nation. He said , "Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along." Democrat candidate Barrack Hussein Obama took this as a direct attack on him. Why? Did he say his name? Did he mention his party? No, on both counts. He did not. Barrack Obama took this as an attack on him because he has a guilty conscious and has in fact said in a CNN/ YouTube debate this past July, that he would meet the leaders of Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Syria, and Cuba “without preconditions”. Iran and Syria are two of the most well known state sponsors of terrorism. In fact just a few hours before Air Force One landed in Israel for the ceremony a Grad type rocket, which is produced in Iran, was launched from Gaza and slammed into a shopping mall in the southern Israel city of Ashkelon injuring many innocent people including women and children.
So, my question for you, Mr. Obama, how can you say that you would meet with these nations, without preconditions? Why are you attacking the president saying that you never said that when you did?
I do not support the president in everything he does, just like I did not like his support of the Immigration "Amnesty" Bill, not a bit. I have to say though, he was speaking the truth and for you to immediately fire back at him for saying this just shows me and the rest of the world one thing, you have a guilty conscious. Also, you say that it is wrong to attack the other political figures when they are on foreign soil, I see way more attacks mentioning names of the one your party is attacking coming from your side of the isle rather than the Republican, Conservative, and Libertarian side combined.
Monday, May 19, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment